Chemical Compatibility of FKM, FFKM, and PTFE O-Ring Materials: Comparative Insights and Selection Guide
Overview of Materials
Introduction: The Critical Role of Chemical Compatibility in Sealing
Seals—whether O-rings or flat gaskets—are the silent guardians of industrial safety, reliability, and performance. Their ability to maintain containment in harsh chemical environments prevents leaks, avoids costly downtime, and safeguards processes from contamination and hazardous exposure. In applications ranging from chemical processing and oil refining to pharmaceuticals and food production, chemical compatibility is one of the defining criteria in selecting a sealing material. When an incompatible seal is exposed to aggressive chemicals, the repercussions are not merely limited to premature seal failure but may also trigger equipment damage, operational hazards, and regulatory violations.
Three high-performance elastomeric materials—FKM (fluoroelastomer), FFKM (perfluoroelastomer), and PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene)—are recognized industry-wide for their exceptional chemical resistance. Their selection, however, depends not only on nominal chemical compatibility but also on their mechanical properties, thermal stability, usability as O-rings or gaskets, cost, and installation considerations. To provide an actionable overview, this article will examine the fundamental properties, strengths, and limitations of each material, explore their resistance profiles against a range of challenging chemicals, and compare the practical merits of O-rings and flat gaskets for demanding industrial environments.
FKM (Fluoroelastomer): Properties and Applications
FKM, generically known as fluoroelastomer or by common trade names such as Viton™ (Chemours), is a family of synthetic rubbers defined under ASTM D1418 standards. Its structure is primarily based on vinylidene fluoride copolymers with other fluorinated monomers, creating a matrix with a high ratio of fluorine atoms. This molecular design results in strong carbon–fluorine bonds, which confer FKM its notable resistance to a wide spectrum of oils, hydrocarbons, fuels, and moderate acids.
Key Characteristics:
Temperature range: Approximately -20 °C to +205 °C (special grades up to +230 °C for short durations)
Chemical compatibility: Excellent with mineral oils, lubricants, non-polar solvents, aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons, many acids, and some oxidizers
Mechanical properties: Good compression set resistance, moderate tensile strength, high flexibility for elastomeric sealing
Common uses: O-rings for fuel systems, valves, pumps, hydraulic cylinders, automotive and aerospace components
Limitations: FKM is less suitable for continuous use in highly concentrated acids (e.g., nitric, formic), strong bases (caustics), hydrofluoric acid, and certain polar solvents (ketones, esters, ethers). It also exhibits some degradation with prolonged exposure to steam and hot water.
FFKM (Perfluoroelastomer): Properties and Applications
FFKM represents the pinnacle of chemical and thermal resistance within elastomeric sealing materials. Unlike partially fluorinated FKMs, FFKMs such as Kalrez® (DuPont), Chemraz®, and Simriz® are fully perfluorinated elastomers, with an even higher fluorine content. Their backbone is primarily perfluoroalkyl chains with specialized cure site monomers to attain cross-linking and maintain rubbery elasticity.
Key Characteristics:
Temperature range: Standard grades function from -20 °C (some down to -40 °C) up to +327 °C (brief excursions possible to +340 °C)
Chemical compatibility: Nearly universal—resistant to almost all acids (incl. nitric, sulfuric), solvents, hydrocarbons, ketones, esters, oxidizing agents, and aggressive mixtures
Mechanical properties: Like FKM, FFKM has elastomeric flexibility with superior compression set resistance and sealing reliability even under cycling or high-pressure conditions
Common uses: O-rings and gaskets in semiconductor fabrication, chemical processing, pharmaceutical manufacturing, aerospace, and oil refining—where failures are not an option and the cost of downtime is prohibitive
Limitations: The exceptional performance comes at a high material cost. FFKM is significantly more expensive than FKM or PTFE and its use should be reserved for the most critical environments. Some specific FFKM grades can show reduced flexibility at very low temperatures and should be tested for extremely cold applications.
PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene): Properties and Applications
Best known under the trade name Teflon™, PTFE is not an elastomer but a high-performance fluoropolymer plastic. It features exceptionally strong carbon–fluorine bonds throughout a linear chain of fully fluorinated units, delivering what is perhaps the broadest chemical inertness profile of any sealant material in use today. PTFE resists nearly all reactive chemicals—even in aggressive acid and oxidizing environments.
Key Characteristics:
Temperature range: -200 °C to +260 °C (short excursions to +327 °C in select grades)
Chemical compatibility: Universal; resists all mineral and organic acids, bases, solvents, alcohols, oils, and oxidizers except rare molten alkali metals and elemental fluorine above 150 °C
Mechanical properties: Very low friction, hydrophobic, non-stick, but rigid (little to no elasticity), low to moderate compressibility, can be prone to cold flow under long-term pressure
Common uses: Flat gaskets for flanges, static cylinder head seals, and static O-ring-style seals in chemical, food, and pharmaceutical equipment
Limitations: PTFE’s rigidity and lack of resilience make it unsuitable for dynamic (moving) sealing applications where continual compression and flexibility are required. Under high loads or prolonged pressure, PTFE may exhibit creep or cold flow, leading to seal relaxation over time if not properly designed.
Chemical Compatibility
Principles of Chemical Resistance
Chemical compatibility describes how well a sealing material endures exposure to a chemical environment over time without degrading, swelling, shrinking, or losing mechanical integrity. Incompatible seals may fail by swelling (reducing seal pressure), softening, embrittlement, dissolution, loss of elasticity, or even complete destruction, causing leak paths and compromising safety and performance. The main factors affecting compatibility include:
Type and concentration of chemicals (acids, bases, solvents, hydrocarbons, oxidizers)
Operating temperature and pressure
Seal geometry and mechanical load
Dynamic (moving) or static (stationary) operating mode
Selecting the correct material involves balancing chemical resistance, thermal stability, mechanical performance, and total cost of ownership.
Comparative Chemical Resistance Table for FKM, FFKM, and PTFE
Discussion: Chemical Family Compatibility
1. Acids
FKM: Performs very well with weak acids and some mineral acids at moderate concentrations, but can degrade quickly with oxidizing acids (concentrated nitric, peracetic) or organic acids at high temperatures.
FFKM: Exhibits outstanding resistance to nearly all acids, including concentrated oxidizers, making it the material of choice for aggressive acid processing.
PTFE: The industry standard for acid resistance. It is inert to essentially all inorganic and organic acids, retaining stability over a wide temperature range, even with strong oxidizers or mixed acid solutions.
2. Solvents
FKM: Highly resistant to aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, xylene, diesel, gasoline), and to alcohols. However, performance is poor with polar solvents such as ethers, ketones, and esters, which can cause swelling or dissolution.
FFKM: Near universal compatibility; resists all common solvents, whether polar or non-polar, including acetone, MEK, ethyl acetate, DMF, and chlorinated hydrocarbons.
PTFE: Virtually all solvents—polar and non-polar—are compatible due to PTFE’s molecular structure. PTFE remains inert to the broadest range of industrial solvents.
3. Hydrocarbons
FKM: “Excellent” compatibility with fuels, lubricants, and most hydrocarbon processing chemicals. Widely used for fuel system seals.
FFKM: Also excellent; often specified as an upgrade path for critical refinery, oil, and gas equipment where any chemical vulnerability is intolerable.
PTFE: Complete resistance; unaffected by crude, refined fuels, or petrochemicals.
4. Oxidizers
FKM: May perform satisfactorily against mild oxidizers at low temperatures and low concentrations, but is not recommended for strong oxidizing environments (chlorates, peroxides, nitric acid) due to possible chain scission and rapid degradation.
FFKM: Exceptional resistance, often specified for peroxide-based or highly oxidative processing systems.
PTFE: Universally inert, compatible even with aggressive mixed oxidants, hot concentrated acids, and strong bleach solutions, except for elemental fluorine (above ~150 °C).
5. Alkalis and Ammonia
FKM: Generally not recommended; alkalis and ammonia can induce rapid degradation, leading to swelling, softening, and mechanical failure.
FFKM: Markedly better resistance than FKM, but should still be checked against highly concentrated or boiling caustics for suitability.
PTFE: Fully inert to common alkali environments, including sodium and potassium hydroxide at all concentrations and temperatures found in industrial plants.
6. Steam and Hot Water
FKM: Elastomeric FKM typically suffers from swelling or embrittlement in long-term steam or hot water applications, with loss of flexibility and potential leakage.
FFKM: Some grades specifically engineered for steam and hot water (e.g., Kalrez® 6230/6230A) offer robust service, although generic FFKM may see some physical property decline in continuous hot aqueous environments.
PTFE: Outstanding performance in hot water, steam, and CIP (clean-in-place) processes, explaining PTFE’s dominance in pharmaceutical and food industries.
O-Rings vs Flat Gaskets: Functional Comparison
O-Rings: Advantages, Limitations, and Use Cases
O-rings are toroidal-shaped elastomeric seals that achieve leak-tight results by elastically deforming under compression inside a machined groove. Their unique geometry enables reliable 360° sealing—axially, radially, or in both planes—making them a staple component across static and dynamic sealing interfaces.
Advantages:
Ease of Installation: O-rings are straightforward to install in dedicated grooves. When properly specified and seated, they self-align and distribute compression evenly.
Dynamic Capability: Their resilience and elasticity enable them to sustain minor hardware movement and vibration (dynamic applications such as pistons, rods, rotating shafts).
Compactness: Very little space is required; O-rings are ideal where envelope size is limited.
Versatility: Available in a broad range of diameters, cross-sections, and material compounds, O-rings can be tailored to demanding tolerance and cleanliness requirements.
Pressure Performance: Excellent under both vacuum and high-pressure; high-quality O-rings maintain their seal even at thousands of psi when properly gland-fitted.
Limitations:
Grooved Hardware Required: O-rings must fit precisely machined grooves, increasing manufacturing complexity and reducing retrofitting flexibility.
Potential for Rolling/Twisting: In high-speed or side-loaded dynamic motion, O-rings may extrude, roll, or twist, sometimes requiring backup rings or anti-extrusion devices.
Limited for Large/Irregular Joints: O-rings become less practical for non-circular or very large seals, as uniform groove compression becomes challenging.
Flat Gaskets: Advantages, Limitations, and Use Cases
Flat gaskets are planar sealing elements (usually round or rectangular sheets) installed between two mating flanges or surfaces. They rely on compressive load to adapt and seal micro-irregularities on hardware.
Advantages:
Surface Irregularity Compensation: The broad surface area of a gasket can fill larger tolerances and unevenness between flanges, achieving a tight seal even when surfaces are not perfectly machined.
Material and Shape Flexibility: Gaskets can be die-cut or machined to almost any shape, thickness, or profile—oval, square, ring, custom multi-bolt patterns—and from numerous materials (PTFE, graphite, rubber, composites, metals).
Static Sealing Applications: Flat gaskets excel in static installations—pipe flanges, manways, cover plates—where no relative movement occurs after assembly.
Installation Simplicity (in Retrofitting): Replacement and installation are often simpler—no need for precision groove machining in the hardware.
Limitations:
No Dynamic Movement: Gaskets are unsuitable for sealing joints that move or vibrate; they are prone to extrusion and rapid wear if subject to motion.
Risk of Uneven Compression: Bolted joints can cause uneven gasket compression; if not torqued precisely or if flanges warp, leaks may develop.
Surface Pressure Sensitivity: The sealing effectiveness greatly depends on achieved bolt load and maintenance of surface pressure; gaskets can creep or relax over time, especially with soft materials like PTFE.
Low Pressure Ratings (Soft Gaskets): Standard soft gaskets typically withstand lower pressures than properly designed or backup-ring-augmented O-ring joints.
Application-Based Comparison
Installation, Maintenance, and Usability
Installation:
O-rings demand careful surface and groove preparation to avoid nicks, twisting, and incorrect seating. Lubrication must be compatible with the elastomer to prevent chemical attack or swelling, especially for food-contact or regulated applications. Training for assembly staff and clear installation protocols minimize premature seal failures.
Flat gaskets require proper flange cleaning, surface alignment, and even torquing of bolts (preferably in a crisscross pattern), using manufacturer guidance for optimal compression and leak-tight performance. Ensuring correct width-to-thickness ratios and avoiding sharp corners can prevent early gasket degradation.
Maintenance and Longevity:
High-quality O-rings and gaskets, properly selected and installed, should last for extended cycles under recommended service conditions. However, exposure to incompatible chemicals, excess temperature/pressure, mechanical abrasion, or improper hardware design will reduce seal service life, as will the presence of abrasive particles or vibration.
Selection Guide: Choosing the Right Material and Seal Type
Key Factors for Material and Seal Selection
Selecting an O-ring or flat gasket for a specific application is not a one-dimensional process. The decision matrix should account for:
Chemical Compatibility: Will the seal be exposed to aggressive acids, solvents, oxidizers, or hydrocarbon process streams? Consult comprehensive compatibility charts and consider worst-case exposures.
Operating Temperature: Does the seal face continuous high heat or extreme cold? Materials like FKM and FFKM handle high heat; PTFE offers ultra-broad thermal range.
Pressure and Speed: High-pressure and dynamic motion require elastomeric materials (O-rings) with sufficient compression set resistance. Static, low-pressure flanged joints may utilize PTFE gaskets.
Mechanical Dynamics: Is the seal for static or dynamic duty? O-rings are essential for cylinders and rotating shafts; flat gaskets for stationary flange joints.
Geometry/Size: Is a custom-shaped seal required? Flat gaskets offer nearly limitless configurability, while O-rings are limited to circular profiles and grooves.
Cost Sensitivity: Is the application critical (where downtime is catastrophic), or is cost a major constraint? FFKM delivers unmatched performance but at a premium price.
Regulatory and Environmental Concerns: Is there a requirement for FDA-grade, WRAS, or other certifications? Will the seal be exposed to food, potable water, or pharmaceuticals?
Installation and Maintenance Constraints: Will frequent maintenance be required? Consider ease of replacement and access.
Pros and Cons Summary
FKM Broad chemical resistance; high heat tolerance; affordable; flexible; dynamic and static applications Not universal for all acids/oxidizers/steam/strong bases; lower low-temp flexibility; not ideal for all solvents
FFKM Universally chemical resistant; highest temperature rating; elastic; reliable dynamic/static seals Very expensive; some low-temp flexibility issues; may be overkill for non-critical processes
PTFE Chemically inert to nearly all substances; broadest temperature span; available as flat gaskets and O-rings (static only); cost-effective for most static needs Rigid, non-elastomeric; not suited for dynamic/moving applications; may require special flange load management due to cold flow
Practical Recommendations and Final Checklist
If your system combines high temperatures, aggressive acids, and pressures in a moving interface, FFKM O-rings are the gold standard—despite their cost, the long-term reliability and process safety delivered are unmatched.
For applications with non-moving flanges and the harshest chemical exposure, PTFE gaskets are universally recommended; they can handle almost everything found in chemical, pharma, or food processing.
For routine fuel, oil, and hydraulic applications where temperature and chemical exposures are moderate, FKM O-rings present the best balance of performance and budget.
Always consult compound-specific compatibility charts from multiple manufacturers and, if in doubt, perform small-scale material tests under actual process conditions before plant-wide adoption.
Conclusion
Selecting the right sealing material for chemical applications is a balance of science, engineering judgment, and operational pragmatism. FKM, FFKM, and PTFE represent the highest-performing families for chemical resistance among elastomeric and polymeric seals. The application environment—static or dynamic, chemical spectrum, temperature, pressure, regulatory requirements, and cost—all play an integral role in identifying not only the ideal material but also whether an O-ring or flat gasket will deliver the best operational performance.
Key Takeaways:
FKM delivers robust, cost-effective service in hydrocarbons and moderate chemical environments, and is well-suited for dynamic sealing as O-rings.
FFKM is the premier choice for universal chemical and temperature resistance in critical dynamic and static applications where no seal failure is permissible.
PTFE offers the broadest chemical and thermal inertness as flat gaskets in static, aggressive chemical environments, especially for large, irregularly shaped joints.
Seal geometry selection (O-ring vs flat gasket) should be guided by mechanical movement, pressure, and installation requirements.
Consult detailed chemical compatibility charts and, for critical processes, run in-situ or laboratory testing on the chosen material.
A thoughtful, criteria-driven approach to material and seal type selection ensures long-term reliability, operational safety, and cost effectiveness in even the harshest process environments.
Great — I’m now working on a detailed article that explores the chemical compatibility of FKM, FFKM, and PTFE seals, comparing O-rings and flat gaskets with a focus on ease of use and chemical resistance. I’ll also include a practical selection guide to help users choose the right seal for their application. This will take a few minutes, so feel free to step away — the article will be saved right here in our conversation.